SC Abandons Aznar v. CTA in the Case of Mcdonald's Philippines Realty Corporation v. CTA

What happened?

• BIR audit: The BIR audited MPRC's books for CY 2007 and later issued a deficiency VAT assessment for interest income not subjected to VAT.

• MPRC’s position: MPRC argued that the 3-year prescription has lapsed before the issuance of FAN/FLD on March 30, 2012 making the assessment void.

• CIR’s position: The CIR insisted that the 10-year period applied because the omission amounted to a “false return.”

• Important disclosure: The interest income was not subjected to VAT but it was reported in MPRC's 2007 income tax return and financial statements.

The Key Legal Issue

Can the BIR use the 10-year assessment period just because a tax return contains an error or omission?

Under Section 222(a) of the Tax Code, the ordinary assessment period is generally 3 years. A 10-year period may apply in cases involving a false/fraudulent return or failure to file a return-subject to legal requirements.

The Court had to determine what qualifies as a "false return" for purposes of the 10-year period.

The Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court abandoned its 1974 Aznar v. CTA ruling and ruled in favor of MPRC and cancelled the deficiency VAT assessment. The extraordinary 10-year prescriptive period for tax assessment applies only to returns with intentional errors or a proven intent to evade taxes. The non-inclusion of interest income in MPRC's VAT return was an honest error, and the same income was properly declared in its ITR and Financial Statements.

Why MPRC Won?

• Assessment prescribed: The 10-year period failed. The assessment was issued beyond the applicable 3-year period, hence void.

• No proof of intent to evade tax: The underdeclaration was not deliberate; the interest income was disclosed in the ITR and financial statements.

• 30% threshold not met: Underdeclaration exceeding 30% may be presumed fraudulent. The interest income was only 25.62%.

• Due process defect: The PAN did not clearly state that the 10-year period was being used, nor adequately disclosed the computation supporting the 30% presumption.

Takeaway for Taxpayers and Businesses

• Know your tax deadlines: Assessments are subject to prescription periods.

• Keep complete records: Proper documentation can help establish good-faith compliance.

• Understand the 30% rule: Substantial underdeclaration may trigger a presumption of a false return.

• Know your rights: BIR assessments must comply with legal and due process requirements.

• Review BIR assessments carefully: Check the computation, basis, and applicable assessment period.

0995 398 9482 · Send us an inquiry

The advisory in seven cards

The same summary, in the form we publish on social media. Select any card to read it full size.